What should organizations analyze to measure post-implementation efficacy of CyberArk?

To effectively measure the post-implementation efficacy of CyberArk, organizations should focus on analyzing audit reports and compliance metrics. These reports provide critical insights into how well the CyberArk solutions are being utilized to secure privileged access and manage sensitive credentials. They detail incidents of access, compliance with security policies, and any anomalies that may suggest potential weaknesses or improvement areas in the implementation.

By reviewing audit reports, organizations can assess whether the CyberArk solution is effectively mitigating risks and ensuring that access controls are being adhered to. Compliance metrics, on the other hand, demonstrate how well the organization is conforming to regulatory standards and internal policies, which is essential for maintaining the integrity of security practices in place. This comprehensive analysis is vital not only for assessing current performance but also for informing future security strategies and improvements.

The other options, while potentially useful, do not provide the same level of direct insight into the efficacy of the CyberArk implementation as audit reports and compliance metrics do. For instance, previous vendor effectiveness can provide context but doesn't specifically measure the current tool's impact. User training satisfaction focuses on the subjective experience of users rather than objective performance data. Operating cost savings, while important for overall fiscal analysis, does not directly correlate with security effectiveness or compliance outcomes. Thus,