How can organizations improve CyberArk's effectiveness post-implementation?

Revising user access levels regularly is vital for enhancing CyberArk's effectiveness after it has been implemented. This ongoing review ensures that user permissions are aligned with their current roles and responsibilities, which might change over time due to factors like promotions, departmental changes, or project completions. Regularly updating access levels minimizes the risk of unauthorized access to sensitive information and systems, thus fortifying the overall security posture.

This practice also helps in compliance with security policies and governance frameworks that require proper user access management. By maintaining a principle of least privilege, organizations can mitigate potential security risks associated with overly permissive access, ultimately supporting the objectives of CyberArk in securing privileged accounts.

In contrast, increasing the IT budget may provide more resources but doesn't directly correlate with improved processes or security measures. Outsourcing IT management could lead to a lack of control over access management decisions that should reside within the organization. Limiting user access to the system, while protective in certain contexts, could also lead to user frustration and impede workflow if not managed carefully and without regular reassessments of who needs access to what.